UseJevAI
← All use cases

Content & data

Citation check

Check whether a source supports a claim, contradicts it, or doesn’t address it.

For researchers, writers, and retrieval app developers

Jev AI playground

Checking availability…
230 / 50,000
Try different inputs · Citation check

Load an input to edit it. Tokens are used only when you run it.

Normal input

A related finding is not evidence for an unmeasured outcome.

Ambiguous input

The qualifier most needs evidence; some is insufficient.

Missing information

Without a passage, the claim cannot be assessed as supported or contradicted.

Questions1
choiceAssess the exact claim against the source. Lack of evidence is not a contradiction. Use contradicted only when the source establishes an incompatible fact.⌄

Answer options

Advanced: edit JSON

Edit or paste a question configuration.

Runs use input tokens and are saved to your account.

Results

Your answers will appear here.

Add your text and questions, then run Jev.

Probabilities express model confidence, not a guarantee of correctness.

Set up this template

Check whether a supplied passage supports the exact claim before citing it.

What to provide

One claim and the source passage intended to support it; include qualifiers such as dates and sample size.

  1. Paste the relevant source passage and one exact claim.
  2. Distinguish an opposing fact from a fact the source never addresses.
  3. Revise the claim or find more evidence when support is missing.

Outputs and rules

support · choice

The relationship between a claim and its supplied evidence.

Assess the exact claim against the source. Lack of evidence is not a contradiction. Use contradicted only when the source establishes an incompatible fact.

supported
The source supplies the evidence needed for the whole claim.
contradicted
The source supplies a fact that is incompatible with the claim.
not_stated
The source does not establish the claim or its opposite.

Try different inputs

Normal input

A related finding is not evidence for an unmeasured outcome.

Source: The trial included 120 participants. After six weeks, the treatment group reported improved sleep quality. The study did not measure productivity. Claim: The trial showed that the treatment improves workplace productivity.
Ambiguous input

The qualifier most needs evidence; some is insufficient.

Source: Some participants reported improved sleep; no exact share was given. Claim: Most participants slept better.
Missing information

Without a passage, the claim cannot be assessed as supported or contradicted.

Source: Not provided. Claim: The trial included 120 participants.

Use the result

Keep supported claims linked to the passage. Send contradictions for correction and not-stated results for another source or a narrower claim.

Limits to keep in mind

This checks the passage you provide. It doesn’t open links or verify whether the source itself is accurate.